The purpose of this Guidance Note is to provide asset managers, property managers and facilities managers with information relating to the inclusion of health and wellbeing within occupier satisfaction surveys.
Occupier satisfaction surveys are a tool which enables property managers to assess how their performance is viewed by the occupiers of a property under their management. This provides property managers with an indication of what is working well and, importantly, where performance has the potential to be improved.
Occupier satisfaction surveys also enable a property manager to demonstrate this performance to an asset manager, including identifying key areas for further discussion with the asset in order to improve the occupiers’ overall perception of the performance of a property.
As a proactive feedback mechanism, regular occupier satisfaction surveys can contribute towards the gradual improvement of a property’s performance which, in turn, can lead to more satisfied occupiers and help to attract potential future occupiers.
Incorporating health and wellbeing within an occupier satisfaction survey can offer a range of benefits, for example:
Health and wellbeing factors can often be embedded within wide-ranging property management aspects. An occupier satisfaction survey can be a useful way of drawing out specific health and wellbeing issues that could be addressed for the overall benefit of a property’s stakeholders.
The table below summarises the key activities associated with including health and wellbeing within an occupier satisfaction survey, and highlights where asset managers, property managers and facilities managers are likely to have a responsibility or specific interest.
Step 1: Designing the survey
Step 2: Issuing survey and collating results
Step 3: Reviewing survey findings
Asset managers have an interest in the outcomes of occupier surveys, which can inform future health and wellbeing investment decisions. Usually, property managers are responsible for co-ordinating the survey process, with input and support from facilities managers.
Incorporating health and wellbeing into occupier satisfaction surveys involves consideration of the following steps.
When designing an occupier satisfaction survey, it is important to decide how it will be framed:
While both options can be useful, property managers should consider which approach will best align with the survey objectives. For example, a dedicated health and wellbeing survey may be a pre-cursor to a planned health and wellbeing campaign.
Questions included in an occupier satisfaction survey can include:
In reality, most surveys will be a mixture of quantitative and qualitative questions, with the balance being influenced by considerations which may include, for example:
There are a wide range of health and wellbeing issues that could be included within an occupier satisfaction survey. Some of the component parts of health and wellbeing are set out below, alongside examples of survey questions that could be considered within an occupier satisfaction survey.
Assessment area: Building location, pedestrian access and commuting
Question area: How easily accessible is the building? How can accessibility be improved?
Assessment area: Active opportunities, use of stairs
Question area: Would occupiers be willing to use the stairs more if incentivised to do so? Are there any barriers to this?
Assessment area: Internal Air Quality
Question area: How do occupiers view the importance of internal air quality in terms? Do they have any views on this in the context of the specific building?
Assessment area: Access to natural daylight and views of nature
How important is this to occupiers? How do they feel the building performs on this?
Assessment area: Health and wellbeing rating and certifications
Are occupiers aware of certification schemes such as Fitwel, The Well Standard, BREEAM In-Use, GRESB. To what extent have occupiers previously actively engaged in these schemes?
Surveys should be run at least once a year. Traditionally, surveys are conducted at the start of the calendar year. However, each property’s individual context and circumstance should be considered.
For example, it may be beneficial to align a survey with an occupiers’ financial year, or alternatively with that of the asset manager. Likewise, it may be important to consider or how the workload commitments for particular sectors, at specific times in the annual cycle, may affect the response rate.
Engaging new occupiers
It is important to provide new occupiers with sufficient time to settle into a building and become familiar with the facilities and workplace initiatives. Ideally, a six to twelve months occupation period will enable an occupier to experience the full cycle of health and wellbeing activities available at a property.
Property managers should encourage incentivising participation to encourage responses. This could involve, for example, making a donation to a health and wellbeing charity for each response received, or entering participants into draw for health and wellbeing related prizes.
Collecting and collating responses
The design of a survey should consider the preferred method for collecting and collating responses. This can involve either quantitative or qualitative assessment.
Quantitative. This could involve issuing the survey via installed or mobile monitoring devices for self-completion. Automated data collection software could be used to collate responses and present data accordingly.
Qualitative. This could involve supporting participants to complete questionnaires, or interviews. Free-hand responses could be manually reviewed and collated into similar types with summarised outcomes presented accordingly.
It is important that property managers engage with both asset and facilities managers to review survey findings and consider appropriate responses.
Asset managers will have an interest in the overall health and wellbeing performance of the building, and how occupiers view the support and quality of service provided by property and facilities managers. Asset managers will also have an interest in occupier feedback relating to a property’s health and wellbeing features which may require investment.
Facilities managers will have an interest in how their performance in delivering health and wellbeing services and initiatives is viewed by occupiers, and where there may be opportunity for improvement.
Following the initial review of survey responses, a property manager should put in place mechanisms to engage occupiers to feedback survey outcomes and discuss intended actions. This engagement may involve occupier engagement forums, for example.
The output of the review of survey findings should be the development of a set of health and wellbeing improvement actions which can be included in a health and wellbeing improvement plan. This plan should include budgeted actions, responsibilities and timeframes.
Undertaking an assessment against a specific health & wellbeing certification tool is another good way of identifying current performance and where improvement measures are required.
The following Guidance Notes contain related information:
Land Securities Creates Green Walls in Central London
Land Securities has created a series of flourishing green walls at its properties and developments in recent years, working with green wall specialist Biotecture. Green walls at New Street Square, 62 Buckingham Gate and 20 Fenchurch Street are improving the experience for office workers, shoppers and pedestrians, and providing important plant and insect ecosystems in the urban environment. Read the case study here.
Beehives and Biodiversity Improvements Add Value at Roaring Meg
At Roaring Meg Shopping Park in Stevenage, Aberdeen Standard Investments and Workman are working together on a series of biodiversity initiatives, which are opening up exciting opportunities to engage with the local community and occupiers. These include introducing beehives, enhancing biodiversity in a small stretch of woodland and running a creative writing competition for local schoolchildren. Read the case study here,
Canary Wharf Group – Lighting Upgrade to Retail Areas
Canary Wharf Group has carried out a major lighting upgrade in retail areas at Cabot Place, Canada Place, Churchill Place and Jubilee Place, installing an energy efficient LED lighting system in the shopping malls and car parks. This upgrade follows a pilot project in 2014, which saw 1.4 km of LED strip lighting installed at Canada Place and monitored for a full year. Informed by the results of this pilot, Canary Wharf Group carried out a tender process involving three providers, appointing Minimise Energy. Together, the team has replaced 9,260 light fittings and 5.3 km of strip lighting with energy efficient LEDs. In addition, 30% of luminaires are fitted with motion sensors to deliver further efficiency savings. Read the case studies here.
TfL Partnership with E.ON Transforms Performance at Palestra
Transport for London (TfL) has completed a major RE:FIT project with E.ON and specialist partners to improve energy efficiency at its Palestra hub. Cost savings and CO2 reductions in the first year significantly exceeded E.ON’s performance guarantees and improvements have also helped improve occupant satisfaction. Read the case study here.
Aberdeen Standard Investments Partners on Energy Efficiency and Wellbeing Pilot
Aberdeen Standard Investments has partnered with KJ Tait Engineers to trial Ecopilot at One Trinity Gardens in Newcastle. In addition to enabling energy and carbon savings, the pilot project has identified opportunities to improve the working environment for occupiers, connecting various building systems so they work collaboratively together and making greater use of the building’s thermal storage capability. Building on this success, the team is now progressing opportunities for wider rollout. Read the case study here.
Hammerson and B&Q Partner on Eco Learning Store
At Cyfarthfa Retail Park in Merthyr Tydfil, Hammerson and B&Q partnered to create an Eco Learning Store. It is one of the first projects in the UK to feature a Transpired Solar Collector system, which harvests the sun’s heat to warm the store’s interior, cutting energy bills and CO2 emissions. Other sustainability measures include rainwater harvesting, green roofs, low carbon materials and low energy lighting. The store presents a highly sustainable blueprint for retail parks and demonstrates the environmental and cost savings that can be achieved by owners and occupiers working together. Read the case study here.
Savills Explores the Social Value of Tackling Local and Global Challenges
To improve understanding of how shopping centres contribute to their local communities, Savills and RDI REIT P.L.C. worked with the Social Value Portal to quantify the social value of property management initiatives at Weston Favell Shopping Centre. They also explored how social value reporting could be mapped to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Read the case study here.
LaSalle and JLL Create an Engaging Culture for Occupiers
LaSalle Investment Management and JLL’s programme of events to nurture a dynamic and engaging culture for occupiers at 27 Great West Road has proved so successful that LaSalle has expanded it to two office parks, with plans for a wider rollout. Occupiers in each building influence the choice of activities, which are all designed to bring together employees from different businesses, creating a community within the building, as well as contributing to the local community. Read the case study here.
Grosvenor’s Sustainable Retrofit at 119 Ebury Street
119 Ebury Street in Belgravia is the UK’s first listed building to achieve BREEAM Outstanding for its proposed design, the highest possible rating. Grosvenor worked closely with Historic England and Westminster City Council to design a scheme that both protects the historically significant fabric of the residential property and achieves leading sustainability standards. The building’s improved appearance, healthy, high quality environment and strong sustainability credentials are all expected to enhance its appeal to occupiers and may increase the property’s rental yield, at the same time as reducing environmental impacts. Read the case study here.
New Landsec HQ Achieves Global First for Wellbeing and Sustainability
In January 2017, Landsec completed the move to its new headquarters at 100 Victoria Street, London. 470 employees are now accommodated on a single floor plate in a high-performance office designed to increase communication and collaboration. The project is the first workplace in the world to achieve both WELL CertifiedTM Silver and BREEAM Outstanding, setting a global benchmark for healthy, sustainable office space. Read the case study here.